Macht Grün den Unterschied?

@book{Geis2005,

title = {Regieren mit Mediation: Das Beteiligungsverfahren zur zukünftigen Entwicklung des Frankfurter Flughafens},

author = {Anna Geis},

editor = {Anna Geis},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-00-00},

volume = {Band 6},

publisher = {VS Verlag},

address = {Wiesbaden },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{NEA2004,

title = {OECD Nuclear Energy Agency: Stepwise Approach to Decision Making for Longterm Radioactive Waste Management},

author = {Nuclear Energy Agency},

editor = {NEA},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-00-00},

publisher = {Experience},

address = {Paris},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{Fung2004,

title = {Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy},

author = {Archon Fung},

isbn = {9780691126081},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-00-00},

publisher = {Princeton University Press},

address = {Princeton},

abstract = {Every month in every neighborhood in Chicago, residents, teachers, school principals, and police officers gather to deliberate about how to improve their schools and make their streets safer. Residents of poor neighborhoods participate as much or more as those from wealthy ones. All voices are heard. Since the meetings began more than a dozen years ago, they have led not only to safer streets but also to surprising improvements in the city's schools. Chicago's police department and school system have become democratic urban institutions unlike any others in America. Empowered Participationis the compelling chronicle of this unprecedented transformation. It is the first comprehensive empirical analysis of the ways in which participatory democracy can be used to effect social change. Using city-wide data and six neighborhood case studies, the book explores how determined Chicago residents, police officers, teachers, and community groups worked to banish crime and transform a failing city school system into a model for educational reform. The author's conclusion: Properly designed and implemented institutions of participatory democratic governance can spark citizen involvement that in turn generates innovative problem-solving and public action. Their participation makes organizations more fair and effective. Though the book focuses on Chicago's municipal agencies, its lessons are applicable to many American cities. Its findings will prove useful not only in the fields of education and law enforcement, but also to sectors as diverse as environmental regulation, social service provision, and workforce development.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{Hocke2002,

title = {Massenmedien und lokaler Protest},

author = {Peter Hocke},

editor = {Hocke},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-00-00},

publisher = {Westdeutscher Verlag},

address = {Opladen},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{Behringer2002,

title = {Legitimität durch Verfahren? Bedingungen semi-konventioneller Partizipation: eine qualitativ-empirische Studie am Beispiel von Fokusgruppen zum Thema »Lokaler Klimaschutz«},

author = {Jeanette Behringer},

editor = {Jeanette Behringer},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-00-00},

publisher = {Roderer},

address = {Regensburg},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{Dryzek2002,

title = {Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations},

author = {John S. Dryzek},

url = {https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001/acprof-9780199250431},

doi = {10.1093/019925043X.001.0001},

isbn = {9780199250431},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-00-00},

publisher = {Oxford University Press},

abstract = {Deliberative Democracy and Beyond takes a critical tour through recent democratic theory, beginning with the deliberative turn that occurred around 1990. The essence of this turn is that democratic legitimacy is to be found in authentic deliberation among those affected by a collective decision. While the deliberative turn was initially a challenge to established institutions and models of democracy, it was soon assimilated by these same institutions and models. Drawing a distinction between liberal constitutionalism and discursive democracy, the author criticizes the former and advocates the latter. He argues that a defensible theory of democracy should be critical of established power, pluralistic, reflexive in questioning established traditions, transnational in its capacity to extend across state boundaries, ecological, and dynamic in its openness to changing constraints upon, and opportunities for, democratization.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}