Jeanette Behringer: Legitimität durch Verfahren? Bedingungen semi-konventioneller Partizipation: eine qualitativ-empirische Studie am Beispiel von Fokusgruppen zum Thema »Lokaler Klimaschutz«. Roderer, Regensburg, 2002. @book{Behringer2002,
title = {Legitimität durch Verfahren? Bedingungen semi-konventioneller Partizipation: eine qualitativ-empirische Studie am Beispiel von Fokusgruppen zum Thema »Lokaler Klimaschutz«},
author = {Jeanette Behringer},
editor = {Jeanette Behringer},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-00-00},
publisher = {Roderer},
address = {Regensburg},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
John S. Dryzek: Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press, 2002, ISBN: 9780199250431. @book{Dryzek2002,
title = {Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations},
author = {John S. Dryzek},
url = {https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001/acprof-9780199250431},
doi = {10.1093/019925043X.001.0001},
isbn = {9780199250431},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-00-00},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
abstract = {Deliberative Democracy and Beyond takes a critical tour through recent democratic theory, beginning with the deliberative turn that occurred around 1990. The essence of this turn is that democratic legitimacy is to be found in authentic deliberation among those affected by a collective decision. While the deliberative turn was initially a challenge to established institutions and models of democracy, it was soon assimilated by these same institutions and models. Drawing a distinction between liberal constitutionalism and discursive democracy, the author criticizes the former and advocates the latter. He argues that a defensible theory of democracy should be critical of established power, pluralistic, reflexive in questioning established traditions, transnational in its capacity to extend across state boundaries, ecological, and dynamic in its openness to changing constraints upon, and opportunities for, democratization.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond takes a critical tour through recent democratic theory, beginning with the deliberative turn that occurred around 1990. The essence of this turn is that democratic legitimacy is to be found in authentic deliberation among those affected by a collective decision. While the deliberative turn was initially a challenge to established institutions and models of democracy, it was soon assimilated by these same institutions and models. Drawing a distinction between liberal constitutionalism and discursive democracy, the author criticizes the former and advocates the latter. He argues that a defensible theory of democracy should be critical of established power, pluralistic, reflexive in questioning established traditions, transnational in its capacity to extend across state boundaries, ecological, and dynamic in its openness to changing constraints upon, and opportunities for, democratization. |
Simon Joss: Die Konsensus Konferenz in Theorie und Anwendung. Gutachten im Auftrag der Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg. Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung Stuttgart, 1999. @techreport{Joss1999,
title = {Die Konsensus Konferenz in Theorie und Anwendung. Gutachten im Auftrag der Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg},
author = {Simon Joss},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-00-00},
publisher = {Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung},
address = {Stuttgart},
institution = {Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
|
Jürgen Blandow; Ulrich Gintzel; Peter Hansbauer: Partizipation als Qualitätsmerkmal in der Heimerziehung: eine Diskussionsgrundlage. Votum, Münster, 1999, ISBN: 9783933158147. @book{Blandow1999,
title = {Partizipation als Qualitätsmerkmal in der Heimerziehung: eine Diskussionsgrundlage},
author = {Jürgen Blandow and Ulrich Gintzel and Peter Hansbauer},
isbn = {9783933158147},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-01-01},
publisher = {Votum},
address = {Münster},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Brian Wynne: May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In: Bronislaw Szerszynski; Scott Lash; Brian Wynne (Hrsg.): Risk, Environment and Modernity, S. 44-83, 1996. @incollection{Wynne1996,
title = {May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide},
author = {Brian Wynne},
editor = {Bronislaw Szerszynski and Scott Lash and Brian Wynne},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-00-00},
booktitle = {Risk, Environment and Modernity},
pages = {44-83},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}
|
Robert Jungk; Norbert Müllert : Zukunftswerkstätten: Wege zur Wiederbelebung der Demokratie. Goldmann Verlag, München, 1983. @book{Jungk1983,
title = {Zukunftswerkstätten: Wege zur Wiederbelebung der Demokratie},
author = {Robert Jungk and Norbert Müllert },
year = {1983},
date = {1983-00-00},
publisher = {Goldmann Verlag},
address = {München},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Sherry Arnstein: A Ladder of Citizen Partizipation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association, Bd. 35, Nr. 4, S. 216-224, 1969. @article{Arnstein1969,
title = {A Ladder of Citizen Partizipation},
author = {Sherry Arnstein},
year = {1969},
date = {1969-00-00},
issuetitle = {Journal of the American Institut of Planners },
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
volume = {35},
number = {4},
pages = {216-224},
abstract = {The heated controversy over “citizen participation,” “citizen control”, and “maximum feasible involvement of the poor,” has been waged largely in terms of exacerbated rhetoric and misleading euphemisms. To encourage a more enlightened dialogue, a typology of citizen participation is offered using examples from three federal social programs: urban renewal, anti-poverty, and Model Cities. The typology, which is designed to be provocative, is arranged in a ladder pattern with each rung corresponding to the extent of citizens' power in determining the plan and/or program.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The heated controversy over “citizen participation,” “citizen control”, and “maximum feasible involvement of the poor,” has been waged largely in terms of exacerbated rhetoric and misleading euphemisms. To encourage a more enlightened dialogue, a typology of citizen participation is offered using examples from three federal social programs: urban renewal, anti-poverty, and Model Cities. The typology, which is designed to be provocative, is arranged in a ladder pattern with each rung corresponding to the extent of citizens' power in determining the plan and/or program. |
Foto: Ger1axg via Wikimedia Commons, Lizenz: CC BY-SA 3.0
