Kai Masser; Adriano Pistoia; Philipp Nitzsche : Bürgerbeteiligung und Web 2.0: Potentiale und Risiken webgestützter Bürgerhaushalte. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2013, ISBN: 978-3658010355. @book{Masser2013,
title = {Bürgerbeteiligung und Web 2.0: Potentiale und Risiken webgestützter Bürgerhaushalte},
author = {Kai Masser and Adriano Pistoia and Philipp Nitzsche },
isbn = {978-3658010355},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-03-16},
publisher = {Springer VS},
address = {Wiesbaden},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg (Hrsg.): Bürgerbeteiligung in Deutschland und Europa. 2013. @periodical{fürpolitischeBaden-Württemberg2013,
title = {Bürgerbeteiligung in Deutschland und Europa},
editor = {Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-11-00},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {periodical}
}
|
Carsten Herzberg: Participatory budgeting in Asia and Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2013. @book{Sintomer2013,
title = {Participatory budgeting in Asia and Europe},
author = {Carsten Herzberg},
editor = { Yves Sintomer and Rudolf Traub-Merz and Zhang Junhua },
year = {2013},
date = {2013-00-00},
publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
address = {Basingstoke},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Schulz; Mack; Renn: Fokusgruppen in der Empirischen Sozialwissenschaft: Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden , 2012. @book{Schulz2012,
title = {Fokusgruppen in der Empirischen Sozialwissenschaft: Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung},
author = {Schulz and Mack and Renn},
editor = {Schulz and Mack and Renn},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
publisher = {Springer VS},
address = {Wiesbaden },
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Klaus Lutz, Eike Rösch, Daniel Seitz (Hrsg.): Partizipation und Engagement im Netz. Neue Chancen für Demokratie und Medienpädagogik. kopaed, 2012, ISBN: 978-3867363471. @collection{Lutz2012,
title = {Partizipation und Engagement im Netz. Neue Chancen für Demokratie und Medienpädagogik},
editor = {Klaus Lutz, Eike Rösch, Daniel Seitz},
isbn = {978-3867363471},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
publisher = {kopaed},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {collection}
}
|
Lars Gräßer, Friedrich Hagedorn (Hrsg.): Soziale und politische Teilhabe im Netz? E-Partizipation als Herausforderung. kopaed-Verlag, 2012, ISBN: 978-3-86736-213-9. @collection{Gräßer2012,
title = {Soziale und politische Teilhabe im Netz? E-Partizipation als Herausforderung},
editor = {Lars Gräßer, Friedrich Hagedorn},
isbn = {978-3-86736-213-9},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
publisher = {kopaed-Verlag},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {collection}
}
|
Roland Roth: Occupy und Acampada: Vorboten einer neuen Protestgeneration?. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Bd. Band 25-26, S. 36-43, 2012. @article{Roth2012,
title = {Occupy und Acampada: Vorboten einer neuen Protestgeneration?},
author = {Roland Roth},
url = {http://www.bpb.de/apuz/138286/vorboten-einer-neuen-protestgeneration},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-06-11},
journal = {Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte},
volume = {Band 25-26},
pages = {36-43},
abstract = {Die Proteste des Jahres 2011 haben verdeutlicht, dass die nationalen Grenzen von Bewegungspolitik offener geworden sind. Internationale Themen und Aktionsformen werden aufgegriffen, Ansätze einer gemeinsamen Agenda entstehen.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Die Proteste des Jahres 2011 haben verdeutlicht, dass die nationalen Grenzen von Bewegungspolitik offener geworden sind. Internationale Themen und Aktionsformen werden aufgegriffen, Ansätze einer gemeinsamen Agenda entstehen. |
Robert Goodin: Innovating Democracy. Democratic Theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, ISBN: 0199650551. @book{Goodin2012,
title = {Innovating Democracy. Democratic Theory and practice after the deliberative turn},
author = {Robert Goodin},
isbn = {0199650551},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford},
abstract = {In recent years democratic theory has taken a deliberative turn. Instead of merely casting the occasional ballot, deliberative democrats want citizens to reason together. They embrace 'talk as a decision procedure'. But of course thousands or millions of people cannot realistically talk to one another all at once. When putting their theories into practice, deliberative democrats therefore tend to focus on 'mini-publics', usually of a couple dozen to a couple hundred people. The central question then is how to connect micro-deliberations in mini-publics to the political decision-making processes of the larger society. In Innovating Democracy, Robert Goodin surveys these new deliberative mechanisms, asking how they work and what we can properly expect of them. Much though they have to offer, they cannot deliver all that deliberative democrats hope. Talk, Goodin concludes, is good as discovery procedure but not as a decision procedure. His slogan is, 'First talk, then vote'. Micro-deliberative mechanisms should supplement, not supplant, representative democracy. Goodin goes on to show how to adapt our thinking about those familiar institutions to take full advantage of deliberative inputs. That involves rethinking who should get a say, how we hold people accountable, how we sequence deliberative moments and what the roles of parties and legislatures can be in that. Revisioning macro-democratic processes in light of the processes and promise of micro-deliberation, Innovating Democracy provides an integrated perspective on democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
In recent years democratic theory has taken a deliberative turn. Instead of merely casting the occasional ballot, deliberative democrats want citizens to reason together. They embrace 'talk as a decision procedure'. But of course thousands or millions of people cannot realistically talk to one another all at once. When putting their theories into practice, deliberative democrats therefore tend to focus on 'mini-publics', usually of a couple dozen to a couple hundred people. The central question then is how to connect micro-deliberations in mini-publics to the political decision-making processes of the larger society. In Innovating Democracy, Robert Goodin surveys these new deliberative mechanisms, asking how they work and what we can properly expect of them. Much though they have to offer, they cannot deliver all that deliberative democrats hope. Talk, Goodin concludes, is good as discovery procedure but not as a decision procedure. His slogan is, 'First talk, then vote'. Micro-deliberative mechanisms should supplement, not supplant, representative democracy. Goodin goes on to show how to adapt our thinking about those familiar institutions to take full advantage of deliberative inputs. That involves rethinking who should get a say, how we hold people accountable, how we sequence deliberative moments and what the roles of parties and legislatures can be in that. Revisioning macro-democratic processes in light of the processes and promise of micro-deliberation, Innovating Democracy provides an integrated perspective on democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. |
Ulrike Wagner, Peter Gerlicher und Niels Brüggen (Hrsg.): Partizipation in und mit dem Social Web – Herausforderungen für die politische Bildung. In: 2011. @article{Wagner2011,
title = {Partizipation in und mit dem Social Web – Herausforderungen für die politische Bildung},
editor = {Ulrike Wagner, Peter Gerlicher und Niels Brüggen},
url = {https://www.jff.de/kompetenzbereiche/gesellschaftliche-beteiligung/details/partizipation-im-und-mit-dem-social-web-herausforderungen-fuer-die-politische-bildung2/},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-00-00},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
Emanuel Richter: Demokratie paradox. In: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, Bd. Band 1, S. 36-39, 2011. @article{Richter2011,
title = {Demokratie paradox},
author = {Emanuel Richter},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-00-00},
journal = {Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik},
volume = {Band 1},
pages = {36-39},
abstract = {Die aktuellen Proteste gegen das Bahnprojekt Stuttgart 21 und gegen die Atompolitik der Bundesregierung markierten den Aufbruch einer „APO 2.0“, meinte Claus Leggewie („Blätter“, 11/2010). Aber sind sie nicht eher Indizien einer veränderten Beziehung zwischen Repräsentanten und Repräsentierten?},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Die aktuellen Proteste gegen das Bahnprojekt Stuttgart 21 und gegen die Atompolitik der Bundesregierung markierten den Aufbruch einer „APO 2.0“, meinte Claus Leggewie („Blätter“, 11/2010). Aber sind sie nicht eher Indizien einer veränderten Beziehung zwischen Repräsentanten und Repräsentierten? |