Literaturverzeichnis
Das Literaturverzeichnis bietet eine Übersicht über Bücher, Forschungsberichte und Artikel zum Thema „Politische Partizipation“.
2018
Bächtiger, Andre; Dryzek, John; Mansbridge, Jane; Warren, Mark
The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy Buch
Oxford University Press , 2018.
Abstract | BibTeX | Schlagwörter: Deliberative Demokratie
@book{Bächtiger2018,
title = {The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy},
author = {Andre Bächtiger and John Dryzek and Jane Mansbridge and Mark Warren},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-00},
publisher = {Oxford University Press },
abstract = {Deliberative democracy has been the main game in contemporary political theory for two decades and has grown enormously in size and importance in political science and many other disciplines, and in political practice. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy takes stock of deliberative democracy as a research field, as well as exploring and creating links with multiple disciplines and policy practice around the globe. It provides a concise history of deliberative ideals in political thought while also discussing their philosophical origins. It locates deliberation in a political system with different spaces, publics, and venues, including parliament and courts but also governance networks, protests, mini-publics, old and new media, and everyday talk. It documents the intersections of deliberative ideals with contemporary political theory, involving epistemology, representation, constitutionalism, justice, and multiculturalism. It explores the intersections of deliberative democracy with major research fields in the social sciences and law, including social and rational choice theory, communications, psychology, sociology, international relations, framing approaches, policy analysis, planning, democratization, and methodology. It engages with practical applications, mapping deliberation as a reform movement and as a device for conflict resolution. It documents the practice and study of deliberative democracy around the world, in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Europe, and global governance. And it provides reflections on the field by pioneering thinkers. },
keywords = {Deliberative Demokratie},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Deliberative democracy has been the main game in contemporary political theory for two decades and has grown enormously in size and importance in political science and many other disciplines, and in political practice. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy takes stock of deliberative democracy as a research field, as well as exploring and creating links with multiple disciplines and policy practice around the globe. It provides a concise history of deliberative ideals in political thought while also discussing their philosophical origins. It locates deliberation in a political system with different spaces, publics, and venues, including parliament and courts but also governance networks, protests, mini-publics, old and new media, and everyday talk. It documents the intersections of deliberative ideals with contemporary political theory, involving epistemology, representation, constitutionalism, justice, and multiculturalism. It explores the intersections of deliberative democracy with major research fields in the social sciences and law, including social and rational choice theory, communications, psychology, sociology, international relations, framing approaches, policy analysis, planning, democratization, and methodology. It engages with practical applications, mapping deliberation as a reform movement and as a device for conflict resolution. It documents the practice and study of deliberative democracy around the world, in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Europe, and global governance. And it provides reflections on the field by pioneering thinkers.
2012
Goodin, Robert
Innovating Democracy. Democratic Theory and practice after the deliberative turn Buch
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, ISBN: 0199650551.
Abstract | BibTeX | Schlagwörter: Deliberative Demokratie, Innovation
@book{Goodin2012,
title = {Innovating Democracy. Democratic Theory and practice after the deliberative turn},
author = {Robert Goodin},
isbn = {0199650551},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford},
abstract = {In recent years democratic theory has taken a deliberative turn. Instead of merely casting the occasional ballot, deliberative democrats want citizens to reason together. They embrace 'talk as a decision procedure'. But of course thousands or millions of people cannot realistically talk to one another all at once. When putting their theories into practice, deliberative democrats therefore tend to focus on 'mini-publics', usually of a couple dozen to a couple hundred people. The central question then is how to connect micro-deliberations in mini-publics to the political decision-making processes of the larger society. In Innovating Democracy, Robert Goodin surveys these new deliberative mechanisms, asking how they work and what we can properly expect of them. Much though they have to offer, they cannot deliver all that deliberative democrats hope. Talk, Goodin concludes, is good as discovery procedure but not as a decision procedure. His slogan is, 'First talk, then vote'. Micro-deliberative mechanisms should supplement, not supplant, representative democracy. Goodin goes on to show how to adapt our thinking about those familiar institutions to take full advantage of deliberative inputs. That involves rethinking who should get a say, how we hold people accountable, how we sequence deliberative moments and what the roles of parties and legislatures can be in that. Revisioning macro-democratic processes in light of the processes and promise of micro-deliberation, Innovating Democracy provides an integrated perspective on democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn.},
keywords = {Deliberative Demokratie, Innovation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
In recent years democratic theory has taken a deliberative turn. Instead of merely casting the occasional ballot, deliberative democrats want citizens to reason together. They embrace 'talk as a decision procedure'. But of course thousands or millions of people cannot realistically talk to one another all at once. When putting their theories into practice, deliberative democrats therefore tend to focus on 'mini-publics', usually of a couple dozen to a couple hundred people. The central question then is how to connect micro-deliberations in mini-publics to the political decision-making processes of the larger society. In Innovating Democracy, Robert Goodin surveys these new deliberative mechanisms, asking how they work and what we can properly expect of them. Much though they have to offer, they cannot deliver all that deliberative democrats hope. Talk, Goodin concludes, is good as discovery procedure but not as a decision procedure. His slogan is, 'First talk, then vote'. Micro-deliberative mechanisms should supplement, not supplant, representative democracy. Goodin goes on to show how to adapt our thinking about those familiar institutions to take full advantage of deliberative inputs. That involves rethinking who should get a say, how we hold people accountable, how we sequence deliberative moments and what the roles of parties and legislatures can be in that. Revisioning macro-democratic processes in light of the processes and promise of micro-deliberation, Innovating Democracy provides an integrated perspective on democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn.
2011
Stollen, Torsten
Deliberation als Brücke zwischen passiver und aktiver Öffentlichkeit: Ein Feldexperiment zu den Chancen und Grenzen verschiedener Formen von Bürgerbeteiligung in der deutschen Gesundheitspolitik Buch
epubli GmbH, Berlin, 2011, ISBN: 978-3844212983.
BibTeX | Schlagwörter: Deliberative Demokratie, Deutschland, Gesundheit, Praxisbeispiel
@book{Stollen2012,
title = {Deliberation als Brücke zwischen passiver und aktiver Öffentlichkeit: Ein Feldexperiment zu den Chancen und Grenzen verschiedener Formen von Bürgerbeteiligung in der deutschen Gesundheitspolitik},
author = {Torsten Stollen},
isbn = {978-3844212983},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-11-25},
publisher = {epubli GmbH},
address = {Berlin},
keywords = {Deliberative Demokratie, Deutschland, Gesundheit, Praxisbeispiel},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Fishkin, James S.
When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation Buch
Oxford University Press, 2011, ISBN: 9780199604432.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Schlagwörter: Deliberative Demokratie, Demokratie
@book{Fishkin2011,
title = {When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation},
author = {James S. Fishkin},
url = {https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604432.001.0001/acprof-9780199604432},
doi = {10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604432.001.0001},
isbn = {9780199604432},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-00-00},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
abstract = {All over the world, democratic reforms have brought power to the people, but under conditions where the people have little opportunity to think about the power that they exercise. This book combines a new theory of democracy with actual practice and shows how an idea that harks back to ancient Athens can be used to revive our modern democracies. This book outlines deliberative democracy projects conducted by the author with various collaborators in the US, China, Britain, Denmark, Australia, Italy, Bulgaria, Northern Ireland, and in the entire European Union. These projects have resulted in the massive expansion of wind power in Texas, the building of sewage treatment plants in China, and greater mutual understanding between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.},
keywords = {Deliberative Demokratie, Demokratie},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
All over the world, democratic reforms have brought power to the people, but under conditions where the people have little opportunity to think about the power that they exercise. This book combines a new theory of democracy with actual practice and shows how an idea that harks back to ancient Athens can be used to revive our modern democracies. This book outlines deliberative democracy projects conducted by the author with various collaborators in the US, China, Britain, Denmark, Australia, Italy, Bulgaria, Northern Ireland, and in the entire European Union. These projects have resulted in the massive expansion of wind power in Texas, the building of sewage treatment plants in China, and greater mutual understanding between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.
2010
Jörke, Dirk
Die Versprechen der Demokratie und die Grenzen der Deliberation Artikel
In: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Bd. 3-4, Nr. 20, S. 269-290, 2010.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Schlagwörter: Deliberative Demokratie, Grenzen
@article{Jörke2010,
title = {Die Versprechen der Demokratie und die Grenzen der Deliberation},
author = {Dirk Jörke },
url = {https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/1430-6387-2010-3-4-269/die-versprechen-der-demokratie-und-die-grenzen-der-deliberation-jahrgang-20-2010-heft-3-4},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-00-00},
journal = {Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft},
volume = {3-4},
number = {20},
pages = {269-290},
abstract = {Der Artikel wendet sich gegen eine deliberative Neubeschreibung der Demokratie, wie sie gegenwärtig insbesondere im Kontext der Diskussion über Demokratie jenseits des Nationalstaates zu beobachten ist. Ausgangspunkt der Kritik ist die Überlegung, dass sich zwar kein Kern der Demokratie bestimmen, die Wirkmächtigkeit der demokratischen Idee sich aber anhand von zwei
Versprechen festmachen lässt. Dabei handelt es sich um das prozedurale Versprechen der gleichen Teilhabe am politischen Prozess und das substantielle Versprechen einer Angleichung der sozialen Lebensverhältnisse. Es wird argumentiert, dass ein deliberatives Verständnis von Demokratie diese beiden Versprechen zu verletzen droht. Dies tritt besonders bei einer deliberativen Deutung der europäischen Union hervor. Im letzten Teil wird demgegenüber der Vorschlag formuliert, nicht länger politische Systeme sondern jene Handlungsweisen als demokratisch zu bezeichnen, die sich gegen Verletzungen der demokratischen Versprechen richten.},
keywords = {Deliberative Demokratie, Grenzen},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Der Artikel wendet sich gegen eine deliberative Neubeschreibung der Demokratie, wie sie gegenwärtig insbesondere im Kontext der Diskussion über Demokratie jenseits des Nationalstaates zu beobachten ist. Ausgangspunkt der Kritik ist die Überlegung, dass sich zwar kein Kern der Demokratie bestimmen, die Wirkmächtigkeit der demokratischen Idee sich aber anhand von zwei
Versprechen festmachen lässt. Dabei handelt es sich um das prozedurale Versprechen der gleichen Teilhabe am politischen Prozess und das substantielle Versprechen einer Angleichung der sozialen Lebensverhältnisse. Es wird argumentiert, dass ein deliberatives Verständnis von Demokratie diese beiden Versprechen zu verletzen droht. Dies tritt besonders bei einer deliberativen Deutung der europäischen Union hervor. Im letzten Teil wird demgegenüber der Vorschlag formuliert, nicht länger politische Systeme sondern jene Handlungsweisen als demokratisch zu bezeichnen, die sich gegen Verletzungen der demokratischen Versprechen richten.
Versprechen festmachen lässt. Dabei handelt es sich um das prozedurale Versprechen der gleichen Teilhabe am politischen Prozess und das substantielle Versprechen einer Angleichung der sozialen Lebensverhältnisse. Es wird argumentiert, dass ein deliberatives Verständnis von Demokratie diese beiden Versprechen zu verletzen droht. Dies tritt besonders bei einer deliberativen Deutung der europäischen Union hervor. Im letzten Teil wird demgegenüber der Vorschlag formuliert, nicht länger politische Systeme sondern jene Handlungsweisen als demokratisch zu bezeichnen, die sich gegen Verletzungen der demokratischen Versprechen richten.
2002
Dryzek, John S.
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations Buch
Oxford University Press, 2002, ISBN: 9780199250431.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Schlagwörter: Deliberative Demokratie
@book{Dryzek2002,
title = {Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations},
author = {John S. Dryzek},
url = {https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001/acprof-9780199250431},
doi = {10.1093/019925043X.001.0001},
isbn = {9780199250431},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-00-00},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
abstract = {Deliberative Democracy and Beyond takes a critical tour through recent democratic theory, beginning with the deliberative turn that occurred around 1990. The essence of this turn is that democratic legitimacy is to be found in authentic deliberation among those affected by a collective decision. While the deliberative turn was initially a challenge to established institutions and models of democracy, it was soon assimilated by these same institutions and models. Drawing a distinction between liberal constitutionalism and discursive democracy, the author criticizes the former and advocates the latter. He argues that a defensible theory of democracy should be critical of established power, pluralistic, reflexive in questioning established traditions, transnational in its capacity to extend across state boundaries, ecological, and dynamic in its openness to changing constraints upon, and opportunities for, democratization.},
keywords = {Deliberative Demokratie},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond takes a critical tour through recent democratic theory, beginning with the deliberative turn that occurred around 1990. The essence of this turn is that democratic legitimacy is to be found in authentic deliberation among those affected by a collective decision. While the deliberative turn was initially a challenge to established institutions and models of democracy, it was soon assimilated by these same institutions and models. Drawing a distinction between liberal constitutionalism and discursive democracy, the author criticizes the former and advocates the latter. He argues that a defensible theory of democracy should be critical of established power, pluralistic, reflexive in questioning established traditions, transnational in its capacity to extend across state boundaries, ecological, and dynamic in its openness to changing constraints upon, and opportunities for, democratization.